+++WARNING!+++ There's spoilage ahead, so if you've been meaning to read either of these and don't want to be spoiled, don't read this post!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c25fa/c25fa3263153b2d05ddb36b70870c3a79ed1c4c7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58094/58094edb629cc192e0168657c4e66bf121d1bd7a" alt=""
So, two books, both involving a murder. Neither one is a conventional mystery. And neither one ever reveals the whole plot behind the murder, brings the culprits to justice, or clears the wrongly accused. They're very similar in their open-ended endings.
And yet, I did not like Death Qualified when I'd finished it. I felt let down, unfulfilled. I wanted my good guys to triumph and my bad guys to pay, darn it all! And although Ordinary Thunderstorms had a similar lack of resolution of similar issues, I liked it.
Why?
I think it's because, somehow, Death sets itself up as a mystery/courtroom drama with a bit of a supernatural twist. And then it fails to fulfill the rules about solutions or crimes that those kinds of books generally adhere to. Thunderstorms, on the other hand, sets itself up as a literary novel with a mystery as a catalyst but not the central theme of the story. And so I didn't mind not getting a tidy wrap-up at the end because I wasn't expecting one.
Silly expectations.
However, both books are quite well-written, so I do recommend them both.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for stopping by! Stay and chat, won't you?